Expat Forum For People Moving Overseas And Living Abroad banner

What do you find 'weird' about the UK?

56K views 152 replies 34 participants last post by  louloumagoo  
Driving... The fact that the majority British drivers actually adhere to speed limits takes a bit of getting used to. In the US, a 60MPH limit means you can usually drive up to 75MPH before you're in danger of being noticed by highway patrol.

I agree wholeheartedly. Here in Canada you have some leeway with the speed limit as well.

The other thing that I find weird is the new law about driving in the middle lane on a highway - you can be charged for staying in it too long - as the driving regulations as I read them simply do not make sense (I looked them up after seeing a story a week or two ago about the first person in Britain who was charged for driving in the middle lane for too long).

Apparently everyone is supposed to drive in the left lane and only use the middle lane to overtake someone - but you then have to get back in the left lane. Based on that, one wonders why the right lane even exists!


Here in Ontario it is completely different. The right lane (the equivalent of the left lane in Britain because we drive on the opposite side of the road) is for those entering and exiting the highway and for slower moving traffic. The middle lane is for everyone else. And the left lane (the equivalent of the right lane in Britain) is for ing/overtaking. But here there is no limit on how long you can drive in the middle or right lane. So long as you are going with the flow of traffic and are not holding everyone else up, you can spend your entire journey in those lanes and the cops couldn't care less. But in Britain everyone is supposed to putt along in the left lane which is just dumb.

And what the hell do those weird, angled lines at the side of the road even mean?

Recycling is out of control with five different bins required. It is especially bad when many houses have nowhere to store the bins except out front which look absolutely terrible. And speaking of control, it often seems that there are too many petty regulations which serve no purpose other than to control people's behaviour and that entities like local councils are far too intrusive. The jobsworths need to mind their own damned business!

A couple of other things bother me as well. First, that they can take your DNA when you are charged with a crime (not convicted, simply charged). Here in Canada that is illegal and DNA can only be taken after conviction and, even then, only for certain crimes. Then there is the warning given when arrested in Britain - that not saying something that you later rely on in court can harm your defense :confused: Here in Canada the right to remain silent is absolute and remaining silent cannot be used against you, or even be cause for suspicion. Now these last two issues only apply to those who get themselves arrested, but I thought of them because I have a lot of British cops in my family and have had discussions about this with them.
 
There's no mashed potato and gravy at KFC. Just gravy. Why???

(Honestly this still annoys me 9 months after my last trip to UK, I'm sure I'll pick up on other weird things once im there permanently- one more week until I arrive!!)

Mashed potatoes are not available at KFC in Canada either. While mashed potatoes are widely eaten in Canada and the UK, they are not usually used as a side dish with fried chicken and most certainly are not used as a side dish with fast food.
 
I had this same discussion with my husband. We made a trip to Wales and I drove half of the way there and back. He told me about the rule of staying in the "slow" lane, except to . Seems crazy to me as long as you are going with the flow of traffic and not speeding, excessively slow, etc.
It is a ridiculous rule. I'd like someone to explain to me why the far right lane even exists if you are supposed to drive in the left lane only, use the middle lane for ing, and then immediately get back into the left lane. Why have three lanes if you are only allowed to use two, and one of them only for a very limited time? Just stupid if you ask me.



Our local service also threatens that if you put any green waste in your general can, they won't pick it up!
Are they going to search through your garbage to check? Too many things are run by useless jobsworths!
 
Originally Posted by clever-octopus View Post

Driving... The fact that the majority British drivers actually adhere to speed limits takes a bit of getting used to. In the US, a 60MPH limit means you can usually drive up to 75MPH before you're in danger of being noticed by highway patrol.



It's because over here there is no such thing as "being noticed" and there is no human element with being let off.

There are speed cameras EVERYWHERE! And the "average speed cameras" make me tense. If you find yourself going a bit fast, you can make up for it by slowing down. But I think most people (certainly not all) go the speed limit so you don't get that envelope in the mail. Even if there was no "flash".


We had speed cameras here in Ontario for a little while until the courts ruled them illegal! We do have red light cameras in some areas but the law states that signs have to be posted warning you that they are there!

This discussion of speed cameras brings up another issue - the fact that CCTV cameras are ubiquitous.

Another thing just popped into my head - the fact that parents in Britain have to ask the school's permission for their child to miss school :confused2: Here the parents are in charge, not the schools, and the parents tell the schools their child will be away - or don't bother and simply inform them upon the student's return. Why are British parents so willing to cede responsibility for their children to the school?

And don't even get me started on the ridiculous claims about people dieing from the cold during the winter. I can barely listen to British talk radio during the colder months because the talk of that, which is complete and utter BS, makes my head explode.

I love Britain but a lot of stuff that goes on there these days is simply moronic. Any time I talk about moving back my parents point out that I would lose my mind over the stupidity.
 
This is a relatively recent phenomenon, as a deterrence to crime and anti-social activity and often it's mandated by law (e.g. in bars, off-licences <liquor stores>). Many law-abiding people feel more assured when they see CCTV.

True, but they do little to prevent crime.



This surely has to do with the differences between the two countries about the role of schools and their legal powers. Attendance at school is legally required for those under school leaving age (16) - unless they are home-schooled, and the school is given powers to sanction absences for serious and compelling reasons (except term-time holidays).
Attendance is legally required here in Canada but it is up to the parents to determine if there is a legitimate reason for the child to be absent, not the school. In Britain, it is up to the school.

You often hear teachers claiming that it disrupts their teaching if a child is away which makes no sense. I have taught at the university level and, if people are absent, it makes my job easier not harder. And if teachers in Canada can easily handle absences why can teachers in Britain not handle them just as easily?


When children start school, parents and guardians enter into legally binding agreement with the school about their respective responsibilities. While the school has duty of care and is responsible for their educational progress, parents must ensure the children attend school regularly and complete their homework and other assignments. Parents can be taken to court and punished if they persistently neglect to ensure their children's regular attendance, including jail term.

And that is over the top. Our schools have a similar relationship with their students and parents but still manage to function perfectly fine without the threat of jail hanging over a parent's head. If we can do it here, why can't they also do so back in Britain?

As for the 'duty of care', that saying makes my head explode because it is so overused, often in the silliest ways. I am not speaking about your use of it, just in general.



Many British homes are inadequately insulated and heated, and hypothermia among the elderly and disabled is a real issue that needs to be addressed. Fuel poverty, where the vulnerable have to choose between eating and heating their homes, is real and a serious social issue. Government does give grants to help insulate homes and replace inefficient heating systems, but more needs to be done to eliminate the scandal of vulnerable people dying or falling seriously ill during the colder months.

All of that is completely false (well not the fuel poverty part as fuel prices are too high, but the part about people dieing from the cold is false).

I work in PR and know spin when I see it. Hell, I write it for a living! Whoever spun the facts and figures in the government report to become "people are dieing from the cold" did a masterful job because people have bought that tripe hook, line, and sinker when it isn't even remotely true - and I know it is not even remotely true because I have read the government report from which those claims originate.

I have to get cleaned up so that I can get out of here for a couple of hours so I don't have time to go into any more detail now, but I will do so later tonight and, when I have done so, you will have a better understanding of my argument that those claims are completely false. I should also still have a copy of the report, which I will post, in order to substantiate what I am saying.



If you've lived here for a number of years and find out truths for yourself, you will begin to understand how British society operates and many problems that still need to be tackled and solved.

One of the problems is jobsworths. Another is people simply not thinking for themselves. That relates back to my comments about the excess winter deaths and, again, I will go into more detail later tonight.
 
The third 'weird' also has some relationship to the first two. In the UK, the word floor is often used to refer to physical ground. 'He fell on the floor' is used when a person falls on the ground outside of a building.

What's weird about that is pretty obvious I'd say. If you fall on the street or in a field, there is no floor, there is only the ground. So why say you fell on the floor? Again, where is the logic in that? Why is it not , 'he fell on the ground'? Indoors floor, outdoors ground.

That isn't a UK thing, it is more of an ignorance/laziness thing as it is very common here in Canada as well. Personally, it drives me nuts - almost as nits as hearing someone say 'open' and 'close' the lights when they mean turn them on or turn them off.
 
Hi,
Who says the US naming convention is the correct one?
I think you might have a bit too much time on your hands!
Likewise - we could produce a thread about things we find weird in the USA - for instance, why do they have World Series sporting competitions - when they are the only country that is competing?
Cheers
Steve

With regards to the World Series - we have a Canadian team (used to have two) so there isn't only one country competing. Also, the players come from lots of different countries. There is also the issue that the World Series is so named because it was originally sponsored by the New York World newspaper (although this is debated).
 
Huh, I've never heard anyone in Canada refer to falling on the floor when outdoors colchar. Are you sure it isn't an immigrant? ie. someone who was not schooled in Canada.

It is all kinds of people, including some who I know were born here. Interestingly enough, I saw that expression used in a British newspaper last week. I cannot which one at the moment but it was a report on a crime (assault) and they mentioned the person being kicked when they were on the 'floor' but that floor was actually a sidewalk.
 
Pretty much.

When I comment on this to my husband, he points out you're supposed to run water in the sink to the proper temperature, then wash there.

I point out to him that there are separate taps in public bathrooms. I am NOT washing in water in a disgusting public sink. I usually end up with a quick dip in too hot water or wash in cold. At home, I always wash my hands in the kitchen sink with the mixer tap anyway.

And it is a waste of water. If you just need to quickly rinse your hands a mixed tap is easier because you are finished in seconds. With separate taps you have to put enough water in the sink to be able to rinse your hands, or risk the water from the hot tap being hot enough to damned near scald you!
 
Post Reply